No gun background check, weapon ban, or gun buyback will ever prevent If you recently picked up a newspaper or turned on to see the news you may have question what is happening in our schools and begi This was the warning printed on a milk-carrying container at the local grocery store where I While many people believe there should be more gun control and the possibility of banning guns all together, I believe the gun con Handguns and other firearms have a long tradition in American civilization.
The right to bear arms is an American right featured i Dear Legislator, I am writing on behalf of my thoughts and myself about gun control laws. My position on this topic is neutral le I think your gun control views are the views of some-one that does not hunt, probably has never hunted, and maybe has never target Need A College Level Paper?
Gun Control Find more results for this search now! Please enter a keyword or topic phrase to perform a search. Should guns be banned? Should guns be banned in America? Gun Control Americans are faced with an ever-growing problem of violence. People are also denied freedom of some activities such as hunting. For many people, hunting is a hobby, and a gun is used in hunting the wild animals. When there are gun control laws, it is very obvious that they are deprived of their interest in their hobby.
For these reasons, there should no be gun control laws, as people should be allowed to use the guns at their discretion Dixon, Most Americans cling to the second amendment that allows citizens to hold firearms wherever they go for their own safety. Most people also believe that the second amendment was placed so that the citizens would be protected from the tyrannical government that seemed to keep people in fear.
People would have the power to rebel in case the government introduced dictatorial policies for their people.
However, though this was not the main aim why people were issued with guns, it served as a purpose as the power of the government would be regulated in a way that the people would be given a chance to make their own ideas and also be given a voice in the government. This is because of the power they were believed to have after they were given the go- ahead to possess the firearms.
The second amendment states that the right of people to keep their arms should not be infringed by any means. The amendment mentions a well- regulated militia which is a phrase that means a group of citizens that act in position of an army.
It continues to describe that it is necessary to the security of a free state. In this phrase, it means that the group will be in the frontline in making sure that it meets the goals and the interests of the citizen army.
The main objective of the citizen army is to protect the best interests of the country, as well as, protecting the government also from foreign intervention. This means that when the gun control laws are being introduced, the main intention of introducing the second amendment is being assumed. This means that the country would be left at the stake of only the military and the citizens would not have the power of protecting their government, as well as, the best interests of their nation Lott Another main reason why the second amendment was made was that the South would be able to control the slaves.
Guns would be essential in helping carry out slavery in the South at ease. Therefore, state militias served as slave patrols where they had to be given the mandate and responsibility to hold guns so that they would be able to control the slaves. The second amendment was also made because of the rebellions that used to take place in the country. For example, the whiskey rebellion caused the government to revoke the amendment as a way of controlling the militias in helping stop the rebellion.
The farmers were rebelling against the government for imposing a new tax, yet it had not been there previously. When the amendment was made, room for rebel had not been created against the government.
However, such rebellions were experienced when the government was not in a position to meet certain needs of the people or it acted in such a way that people viewed as selfish or had corrupt intentions. For this reason, the state has been enjoying its democratic right because rebellions and demonstrations are respected because the government realizes the power within the people.
If such power had not been vested in the people, it would be difficult in the United States to stage rebellions and demonstrations in fight for human rights and freedom. Imposing gun control laws in the country is, therefore, a way of curtailing freedom in the United States, as the people may lack the voice and the authority they had previously Bijlefeld There has also been an argument that it is not the guns that kill people, but it is the people themselves who kill other people.
In this context, those against the gun controls argue that it is a personal initiative for a criminal to engage in crime, whether he holds a gun or not.
In this regard, he does not have to possess gun for him to hold a gun. More comparisons are made between other weapons that are used to kill people and the guns that are always blamed for being used in killing people. People use crude weapons including screwdrivers, knives, swords or any metallic objects if they have the intention to kill other people. The gun just necessitates and quickens the process, and they argue that the killing would still have taken place, in the absence of the gun.
Therefore, before placing the gun control laws as a measure to reduce violence and crime, more research should be indulged and there should be other actions that ought to be taken as a way of reducing the violence. For example, most people who commit these crimes are usually in the influence of high drug intoxication. It is these drugs that will make them use the guns or other weapons around them in committing violence.
The best way to help reduce violence in such a person would not be confiscating the gun he is carrying, but rehabilitating him as a way to reduce the drug use in him. This is because even after taking the gun, the drug effects may show him to use other weapons to commit the crime.
However, when he has been led out of using the drugs, he will not use the gun wrongly, and will continue keeping and bearing it for the right purpose, which is self- defense and protecting the interests of the nation, as outlined in the constitution Dixon, Ideally, the legislations that have been created for gun control are meant for the criminals. It goes without saying that criminals do not follow the law, and making such legislation does not stop them from committing their crimes.
Criminals are very conversant with the laws and they intentionally break them so that they get what they want.
Gun control is officially called regulation of firearms and it refers to all laws related to the use of arms on a territory. These ones are related to several aspects like manufacture, sale, transfer, possession, modification and use of guns.
Do you have an interest in writing a research paper on gun control? Recently, President Obama and other Democratic members of Congress have strongly pushed for a critical discussion on gun control/5(31).
Free Term Papers on Gun Control available at sportwallpaper.tk, the largest free term paper community. We provide essays, research papers, term papers, dissertations and other writing sportwallpaper.tkarch Research Paper on Gun Control Posted by Ultius on Saturday, 16 March in Sample WorkBuying a Research Paper on Gun Control from UltiusRecently.
gun control research paper As we have discussed, gun control is an extremely broad and multi-angled topic. Naturally, it is much bigger than one can cover in any essay, and you can investigate this topic in a gun control research paper or . Gun Control Essay Example Purchasing a Research Paper on Gun Control at sportwallpaper.tk Not long ago, the problem of gun control has been raised by the President of the United States and Democratic members of Congress.