A good literature review should critically evaluate the quality and findings of the research. A good literature review should avoid the temptation of stressing the importance of a particular research program. The fact that a researcher is undertaking the research program speaks for its importance, and an educated reader may well be insulted that they are not allowed to judge the importance for themselves. They want to be re-assured that it is a serious paper, not a pseudo-scientific sales advertisement.
Whilst some literature reviews can be presented in a chronological order, this is best avoided. For example, a review of Victorian Age Physics may certainly present J. Otherwise, this is usually perceived as being a little lazy, and it is better to organize the review around ideas and individual points. As a general rule, especially for a longer review, each paragraph should address one point, and present and evaluate all of the available evidence, from all possible differing points of view.
Evaluating the credibility of sources is one of the most difficult aspects of a literature review, especially with the ease of finding information on the internet. The only real way to evaluate is through experience, but there are luckily a few tricks for evaluating information quickly and accurately. There is such a thing as too much information.
Google does not distinguish or judge the quality of results, only how search engine friendly a paper is. This is why it is still good practice to begin research in an academic library. Any journals found there can be regarded as safe and credible. The next stage is to use the internet, and this is where the difficulties begin.
It can be helpful to structure your internet research as if it were conducted on paper. The easiest way is to scan the work, using the abstract and introduction as guides. This helps to eliminate the non-relevant work and also some of the lower quality research. If it sets off alarm bells, there may be something wrong, and the paper is probably of a low quality.
But be very careful not to fall into the trap of rejecting research just because it conflicts with your hypothesis. Failure to do this will completely invalidate the literature review and potentially undermine the research project. Any research that may be relevant should be moved to the shortlist folder.
The next stage is to critically evaluate the paper and decide if the research is sufficient quality. Think about it this way: A smaller number of quality sources is far preferable than a long but irrelevant list.
Check into the credentials of any source which you rely on heavily for the literature review. The reputation of the University or organization is a factor, as is the experience of the researcher. If their name keeps cropping up, and they have written many papers, the source is probably OK. Good research should have been replicated by other independent researchers, with similar results, showing that the information is fairly safe to use.
If the process is proving to be difficult and in some fields like medicine and environmental research, there is a lot of poor science do not be afraid to ask a supervisor for advice. They should know some trustworthy sources to look at. Now you have a proper topic , analyzed it , got a list of ideas , and performed literature research and you are ready for the next stage.
Stages of Writing Literature Research. Literature Research It is recommended to approach this stage after you have chosen the proper topic , analyzed it in details and brainstormed key ideas. We recommend to go through such stages of literature research: The first step here is search for information based on the topic analysis and the key words obtained in the process of brainstorming.
This can be useful for the Internet browsing as well as the library cataloging systems. Look through the materials you have found and evaluate them critically. If the information seems interesting, save a copy or make detailed notes for reference. If you use a printed book from a library, make sure you note down the pages, as you will further need them for quoting. After having studied the requirements for citation, prepare a reference section page.
III. Analysis/Argument- Core of the essay A. Breaks down the thesis into sub-points (separate paragraph for each) 1. Establishes broad points 2. Identifies each point and defines it 3. Narrows each point with specific details 4. Shows comparisons or contrasts to be analyzed B. Gives reasons for points or arguments that you make 1.
A literary analysis essay is an academic assignment that examines and evaluates a work of literature or a given aspect of a specific literary piece. It tells about the big idea or theme of a book you’ve read.
Literature Research It is recommended to approach this stage after you have chosen the proper topic, analyzed it in details and brainstormed key ideas. Creating an academic essay is very likely to be based on literature research – the task that can be considered unconquerable by many students. 7 Literary Essay Examples & Samples Part of submissions you give in school are essays. Essay writing is introduced in school is largely due to prepare a student or individual for work which also involves writing essays of sorts.
HOW TO WRITE A LITERARY ANALYSIS ESSAY The purpose of a literary analysis essay is to carefully examine and sometimes evaluate a work of literature or an aspect of a work of literature. A Guide to Writing the Literary Analysis Essay. I. INTRODUCTION: the first paragraph in your sportwallpaper.tk begins creatively in order to catch your reader’s interest, provides essential background about the literary work, and.